Please choose your topic and select 'Filter Topics'.

  • All Topics

Capturing the impact of PPI – CRIG paper

Uploaded: 5th July 2018 | Topic: Impact

Resource was added by: Bec Hanley

What is this resource?
A list of things CRIG members think it’s important to consider when capturing the impact of involvement in research.

Who was it developed by?
CRIG members

When might it be useful?
Read this paper to plan or improve the way you capture the impact of involvement. This document is public and can be shared widely.

Impact report – Alzheimer’s Society Research Network

Uploaded: 15th May 2018 | Topic: Impact

Resource was added by: Bec Hanley

What is this resource?
Alzheimer’s Society conducted an online survey and interviews with their Research Network volunteers and researchers they had collaborated with.This report details the output of the surveys and interviews, shares case studies and demonstrates the range of ways involvement can have an impact in research.

Who was it developed by?
Alzheimer’s Society.

When might it be useful?
Read this report to plan or improve the way you capture and share the impact of involvement.

PPI feedback – guidance for researchers

Uploaded: 19th April 2018 | Topic: Impact

Resource was added by: Bec Hanley

What is this resource?
This resource gives guidance to researchers on how to give feedback to people who get involved in research.

Who was it developed by?
Researchers at the University of Hertfordshire.

When might it be useful?
Share this resource with researchers to encourage them to provide feedback and updates to people who get involved in their work.

Arthritis Research UK involvement scoring system

Uploaded: 3rd April 2018 | Topic: Impact

Resource was added by: Bec Hanley

This slide deck explains a system that Chris Macdonald and his colleagues at Arthritis Research UK have developed to enable them to attribute scores to every funded research application to reflect the nature of interaction with patients and the quality of that interaction.

Chris says that although it's not perfect, it means that when you combine the score with other searchable and filter-able criteria, you can correlate scores with institution, individuals, type of grant, research call it was awarded in etc. ARUK can then analyse, assess and identify who needs support, who they can use for case studies or speakers at training sessions, or if a centre needs a slap on the wrist and an offer of training. They can also look at what are the most common types of involvement in certain types research or look across the whole portfolio over time to see how KPI’s (such as a simple ‘have they involved’) change as the community is better resourced and informed.